Well, I've been defriended by one of the Chlark shippers on my flist, I suspect after the comment I made about Chloe in my review post yesterday. Really, I love Chloe, I just wish the writers would stop being so silly with her.
Anyway, I'm off to Stratford Upon Avon now peeps. You'll probably hear the squee from wherever you are when I arrive. This is like a trip to Mecca for me. Seeing David Tennant tomorrow is just an added bonus ;)
I have free wifi in my hotel so I might see you online later. The hotel is so far away from town I'll probably just stay in tonight and just devote all of tomorrow to sightseeing
Do you think I'll get into trouble for using the hotel internet to download the next episode of True Blood? ;)
Anyway, I'm off to Stratford Upon Avon now peeps. You'll probably hear the squee from wherever you are when I arrive. This is like a trip to Mecca for me. Seeing David Tennant tomorrow is just an added bonus ;)
I have free wifi in my hotel so I might see you online later. The hotel is so far away from town I'll probably just stay in tonight and just devote all of tomorrow to sightseeing
Do you think I'll get into trouble for using the hotel internet to download the next episode of True Blood? ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 09:48 am (UTC)If that's the case, after what I said about Chloe I'm in danger of losing 1/3 of my flist. *looks*
Mwah. What they don't know, they can't complain about. >:)
Enjoy Tennant tomorrow!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:47 pm (UTC)Yeah, I'm not going to censor my journal just because some people might not like what I'm saying
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 12:16 pm (UTC)Hmmm.... I was going to use a Chloe icon for this post and realized that I didn't have one!
As if I needed more proof that I am not a Chlarker....
LOL!
*grins*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:49 pm (UTC)I would choose Clois over Chlark if I had to pick a het ship. Chloe and Clark are too much like brother and sister. It'd be like shipping Buffy and Xander (which I know some people do but I never did)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 03:33 pm (UTC)I have Chlarkers on my flist, but I regretably had to defriend a few after they'd shown some hate for Lois or Lana.
I don't mind my flisters not liking a pairing or one of the characters, but I will defriend if the hate gets too over-the-top...
What you said, to me, wasn't over the top. I think it's a legitimate complaint.
I don't understand why they gave Chloe the healing power to begin with... It came in handy as yet another Deus Ex Machina (or Deus Ex Chloe), but anything that comes off as a Deus Ex Machina type of plot point should probably in general be avoided and the writers should have known better.
Now she's a super computer thanks to Brainiac? That power actually makes more sense, given her skills with computers, but still looks like a Deus Ex Machina plot point....
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 04:24 pm (UTC)So, now her powers are like Superman Returns with the kid.
The execs didn't like the kid, didn't think that he'd worked out the way that Singer had thought, so rumor was that they were going to get rid of the kid for the next Superman film.
But how do you do that? He's Superman's kid, how do you get rid of him? Kill him? Send him off to the farm to live with grandma? How do you get rid of a kid without making both Lois and Clark look like awful parents? If you get rid of him, then it looks like you admit you made a mistake and nevermind the consequences of fixing it.
Same thing with Chloe's power: how do you get rid of the healing power without making it look like they have no clue what to do with Chloe?
The thing is, you can't... they did it and they should have stuck with it.
I really hope that the healing power just didn't work on Clark because he's not human, not because Brainiac took that power away and gave her a new one.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 05:08 pm (UTC)Any new Superman film will not be based on Singer's film, so no Singer, no SR continuity, no kid.
Thank goodness, I thought that was an awful idea.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 05:46 pm (UTC)They should have had something more sinister than that....
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 05:47 pm (UTC)And Lois was way too young
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 06:57 pm (UTC)Meh...
I'm glad they're jetisoning Singer's continuity. He didn't understand anything about what makes Superman, Lois and Lex such great characters.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 12:45 pm (UTC)Have a great time!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 02:53 pm (UTC)Which is nothing against Allison or the character.
On the postive side, go look at my lj for a pic of your future husband.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 06:46 pm (UTC)Anyway, someone defriended me right after I posted about Dickfish. So who knows.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 06:49 pm (UTC)I don't think what they're doing to Chloe is any different to the way they've treated Lana, Lex and Clark in the past ie manipulating their character to suit the plot
They're all Mary Sue's as far as I'm concerned (and whatever the male equivalent is)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-23 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-23 06:40 am (UTC)