Terminator
Dec. 6th, 2008 01:46 pmI spent the first half of this episode wondering what the hell was going on and the second half thinking it was awesome.
I wasn't particularly keen on the John/Riley stuff but I loved Cameron's storyline.
Did anyone else notice that the stars she scanned to calculate the dates bore a startling resemblence to Sarah's three dots?
And I think this is the first episode where Sarah herself has had pretty much no involvement whatsoever.
It was just a really nice character building episode and I liked it a lot
no subject
Date: 2008-12-06 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-06 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-06 04:34 pm (UTC)For the first time in this series, we got a sense that the future can be changed the other week when Derek, and that other girl, come from two different futures. I have to say, the shows needed it for along time, the main driving force behind the show is time travel, and trying to change the future. They were at risk of becomming Terminator 3 (which is an awesome film I love, but a different entity to TSCC, so dangerous ground), in so far as it was becomming just an excuse to develop the characters to their future tenses, and move them in a situation where they can fulfill a destiny.
Of course destiny doesn't exist, time travel renders that assumption moot, only the appearance of destiny exists. As I've commented before, the cycle of past/future is now on an going thing, SkyNet is constantly altering it's plans to fit with changes in the future that it is affected by. I think I'm confident in saying that SkyNet is in fact communicating with itself in multiple re-distributions of history. SkyNet knows far more than simply being from the future, it knows the alternative futures it's created.
Obviously so far, none has led to the end of the resistance, and we can mutter over a basic stumbling block on an obviously pwoerful artificially intelligent being, not being able to work out how to snuff a few humans, who should really pose no threat, another time. For now, we'll assume the general moral guidance of the whole Terminator series is correct, no machine can truly beat the human heart, and desire for survival. Soppy I know, but even though it's rarely said (though there have been references in TSCC), it's the altruism from which the show is derived.
In this episode, we saw a Terminator changing the past, and then having to change the past further to put it back. That in itself is revealing, the Terminator took on a human character, albeit an severly warped one, to do so - I doubt very much if that were a situation for which it was programmed, but the Terminator thought for itself. The first T800/101 we come across, Arnie's first incarnation, could only think for itself within the parameters of it's mission. It made no effort to blend in beyond acquiring clothes. It merely blew things up, and fired guns, the only time it goes undercover, is to repair itself, a time when it is vulnerable.
The second and third Arnies (though the third does not exist anymore since Cameron altered time), have a higher ability to think for themselves, but that's still within the parameter of their missions. Obviously their mission is a defensive one, the ultimate defensive line backer, as Claire would say (show cross over in comment?). That said, John manages to convince Arnie's second incarnation to take on a more aggressive role, hunting down Cyberdine systems, and halting that incarnation of the future (the accelerated doomsday situation - and a completely different future to SkyNet). That was with John's orders though, and both the second and third incarnations of Arnie are designed to follow orders from people who exist in the past.
Back to TSCC, we saw a Terminator creating it's own orders, to fulfill a mission objective. It's not the first time, Cromartie is the same, the level of independance which he had, is largely unprecedented.
Now, Cameron is completely seperate from the whole of this. Her mission is unclear, or she's been given so many possibly mission objectives, that she effectively has free reign. However, I suspect, it's actually that she has no actual digital orders, just a request from future John. Because it now seems clear to me, that Cameron and John were lovers in the future, even if she wasn't quite feeling love then, but a simulacrum that bordered on the verge of artificial intelligence realisation.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-06 04:35 pm (UTC)Catherine, I actually think, as a new generation T-1000, she has a less scaled back version of SkyNet in her head, she is in fact SkyNet's back up plan - SkyNet 1.1 so to speak. I do believe that her cover has infiltrated her conciousness, and that she can no longer remember the future - which is entirely possible what SkyNet wants. She knows she's not human, she knows that there are other robots, but she's not really aware of what's going on. Deep inside her is the programming that will unleash her as SkyNet - but timing is everything. That's my theory anyway, and explains why she's even more odd than the others I've explained. Also, it's worth noting, Catherine Weaver is a double blind, the Terminators sent someone to kill the psychiatrist, that she was using, ergo, SkyNet's 1.1 existence is a secret from all other Terminators, and possibly from an estranged future - thus the ultimate wild card.
Back to Cameron, so she loves. Her simulacrum is growing into the real thing. The version of SkyNet inside her was corrupted, and reprogrammed by future John, maybe because he felt so alone in the future, leader of the resistance, near god like to the men and women who follow him, possibly after all he's been through with machines (and remember he's loved two before, the second and third incarnations of Arnie (it's possibly this version of John is the one who went through the events of Terminator 3, and survived his wife after - armed with foreknowledge of his own death), and felt on some level they loved him, so believes that the machines can be more than killers), he knows that at least for a while,he can find comfort with one.
Also, the identity of Cameron is ripped from a real person. SkyNet applied a character profile that was meant to mimic the real Cameron, and of course SkyNet doesn't understand love, other than it's own existence, so it doesn't realise the effect of a truly human character would have on it's own AI.
God help us if SkyNet tries to do something similar with John, SkyNet would probably lose it, and rather than having a small string of hope for the future, the future would simply cease to be as it destroys itself, and the world. However, a complete character deconstruction, and absorbtion into SkyNet, may ultimately be something SkyNet desires, looking back at what I said about it not being able to snuff humans. It may decide it's best chance for victory lies in understanding the altruism of it's own existence.
This is part three (go back two if you read it in your emails Hils)
Date: 2008-12-06 04:35 pm (UTC)Anyway, she is seeking to introduce a blocking mechanism to John's plans, by making him love Riley. An ultimately infantile, and futile attempt at altering the future. It will just create a new instance, without any actual control. John will discover the truth at some point, and that will introduce the idea about a bridge between humans and machines at a different point, ultimately he will realise this is the only true way for the future to play out. Much like in the ending of the new ending for the Dune series.
In fact, Riley is more likely to push John that way, than distract him from that path. Once he finds out, he will be hurt, and there's Cameron with her naieve, and uneducated love, waiting for him, trying to ensnare him, much in the way he does to her in the future. She's trying to recapture that, because emotions are ultimately addictive.
All in all a brilliant episode, and a brilliant few episodes. I'm glad I got to watch them all in a short space of time. Saving up episodes is fun.
Re: This is part three (go back two if you read it in your emails Hils)
Date: 2008-12-06 04:37 pm (UTC)I need more.
Shame I may have to give it up for a bit - boo
Re: This is part three (go back two if you read it in your emails Hils)
Date: 2008-12-06 06:11 pm (UTC)Re: This is part three (go back two if you read it in your emails Hils)
Date: 2008-12-06 06:20 pm (UTC)It is a long arse comment, probably a tad over board for a series I'm at best mildly hot about :-s