hils: (DS King by me)
hils ([personal profile] hils) wrote2009-01-03 04:17 pm

Question for my fic

Is there a correct way of addressing a king compared to addressing a prince?

I know in Lancelot, he addresses Arthur as 'sire' and Uther as 'your majesty'. Is that the norm? Would people call Uther 'sire' as well? In fact doesn't Gaius call Uther 'sire'?

*is confused*
ext_8587: (SV: MR lex dancing)

[identity profile] tyffi.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Oy, let's hope you'll never meet your queen. ;) You are a bad, very bad Brit. ;P

Maybe this will help you (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forms_of_address_in_the_United_Kingdom).

Royalty... who needs that? *lol*

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh! Well, I know how to address the queen!

It's interesting that according to that a prince should be addressed as 'sir' and not 'sire'
ext_8587: (heroes: sylar calling)

[identity profile] tyffi.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, I didn't make the rules. We don't even have royals anymore. *lol* But certainly, a prince is a sir because he's younger (unless he's Charles) and thus haven't earned the extra E yet.

Makes totally sense, eh?! LOL!

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Nothing about the english language makes sense. LOL!

[identity profile] annwnrho.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly you'd only call Uther Your Majesty and Sire means sort of generic 'master' or royal I think. Perhaps Gaius calls him sire because he knows him longer and earned the right to not call him you majesty. So it may do with how well the person knows Uther/ Arthur or the situation so Gaius call Uther sire in an informal sort of way. If any of this made sense to you I will be amazed.

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually that did make sense. Thanks!

[identity profile] kelene.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)
XD

I'm pretty sure you use Your Majesty for Uther and Your Royal PratHighness for Arthur.

Not sure about the Sire. Maybe it's a general term for male royalty?

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe!

*hopes Merlin will call Arthur a prat again in the next series*

I get the feeling the writers of Merlin (and I nearly wrote Smallville there, clearly I bitch about them too much) made up their own rules for how to address royalty.
spikewriter: (Default)

[personal profile] spikewriter 2009-01-03 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, "sire" is appropriate. I don't think "Your Grace" is appropriate yet, and most people associate that with Dukes. (Forms of address do change through history. Trust me on this; I've dealt with it more times than I care to remember.)

I think the general is kings/queens are "majesty" and princes/princesses are "highness". Unless, of course, one is a bastard offspring who's secretly plotting to take over the throne. In that case, "you little jerk" is perfectly appropriate. ;)

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee! Perfect! Thanks!
ext_3751: (EnglishRose2)

[identity profile] phoebesmum.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I would file it under 'The MerlinVerse makes no sense and bears no relation either to reality or any accepted form of mythology but is cracking good fun anyway so I can make up my own rules, god knows the scriptwriters do'.

At that point in time (at WHAT point in time?!) they wouldn't have been speaking English anyway.

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL!!! Very good points, well made.

[identity profile] solar-cat.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAA!!! BEST. FILE. EVER. XDDDD *ded*

I'm sorry, your comment KILLED me, and I had to stop and say so. XD

[identity profile] foreign-origin.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with the opinion that there are no rules about that in Merlin, the show is a pure crack in every way :P
Also I found the whole thing with sir/sire very amusing, I didn't even know something like "sire" exists before I started watching this show :P

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I'd heard of 'sire' before. I just didn't realise there were rules about who you could use it with. LOL!

[identity profile] foreign-origin.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
lol and I though it was always "sir", didn't know there's another form :P and I actually like all those weird English royal things :P

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe! Yeah, we're quirky

[identity profile] lexalicious70.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Well . . . in Blackadder, Edmund calls the Prince "Your Highness," most of the time, but also "sire."

Maybe it's more common to call a king "Your majesty." Hmmm, this is a good question!

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 06:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe! I think about the most random things sometimes

[identity profile] hollyxu.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm really not sure as the Merlin ways of addressing royalty are all off - I mean, Uther (and Arthur) is called 'Your Highness' and 'Your Majesty' at different times, though that could be Merlin's harebrained ways showing.

'Sire' applies to the king. Everyone else is pretty much 'sir' for a knight, 'my lord/lady' for lords and ladies, 'lordship/ladyship' if you're a baron, and the requisite 'your grace' for dukes and duchesses. Not sure what happens to a marquess, earl or an Archduke (or a Grand duke, for that matter).

But seriously, you'll never see that in Merlin.

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe! Fair enough.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_calex_/ 2009-01-03 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I think "sire" can be used for both. But the difference is that a king would be referred to as "majesty" whereas a prince would be referred to as "highness".

[identity profile] hils.livejournal.com 2009-01-03 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, ok. Thanks!